 |
 | BESAFE presentation for BIOMOT Kickoff meeting
| 250.55KB | 22.02.2012 | Pavel Stoev | PROJECT MEETINGS | |
|
 | Practical Arrangment Ispra meeting
| 65.5KB | 21.02.2013 | Joachim Maes | PROJECT MEETINGS | |
|
| Literature review on methods to assess the effectiveness of arguments for biodiversity protection
Task 2.1 | 224KB | 04.12.2012 | Marion Bogers | WP2_DOCUMENTATION | |
|
| BESAFE Protocol on evaluating the effectiveness of arguments
Eeva Primmer, Pekka Jokinen, Malgorzata Blicharska
(7 May 2013 -First version March 2012 – Please feel welcome to comment. Address all comments to: eeva.primmer@ymparisto.fi; Pekka.jokinen@uef.fi; Malgorzata.Blicharska@slu.se)
| 57.94KB | 08.05.2013 | Eeva Primmer | WP2_DOCUMENTATION | |
|
| BESAFE Protocol on evaluating the effectiveness of arguments
BESAFE Protocol on evaluating the effectiveness of arguments
Eeva Primmer, Pekka Jokinen, Malgorzata Blicharska
(7 May 2013 -First version March 2012 – Please feel welcome to comment. Address all comments to: eeva.primmer@ymparisto.fi; Pekka.jokinen@uef.fi; Malgorzata.Blicharska@slu.se)
| 57.94KB | 10.05.2013 | Margarita Grudova | WP2_DOCUMENTATION | |
|
| Template for the deep case study reporting
| 17.17KB | 09.12.2013 | Pekka Jokinen | WP2_DOCUMENTATION | |
|
 | D6.1 Project website
| 122.33KB | 29.09.2012 | Marion Bogers | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| Communication strategy
| 420.74KB | 29.09.2012 | Marion Bogers | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| Deliverable No: D2.1 Report on the selection of case studies
The general aim of the BESAFE project is to investigate which arguments are the most effective in conserving biodiversity in different contexts. This report outlines the selection process of the case studies which will be used to answer the main research questions of the project. The paper reports the particular steps of the process, describes the relevant criteria for selection and provides the most essential information about each of the chosen case studies. The final set of 12 case studies represents a wide variety of ecological, social-economic and political contexts, as well as a diversity of different governance levels. Moreover, the cases address several governance levels and thus enable analysis of the links and transferability between the levels. In addition, two comparative studies have been chosen to enable a European level comparison between different countries. | 331.35KB | 29.11.2012 | Margarita Grudova | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| D1.1 Classification of arguments and provisional framework
| 754.55KB | 02.04.2013 | Marion Bogers | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| D6.2 Communication Strategy updated Sept 2013
| 638.89KB | 26.09.2013 | Marion Bogers | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| D1.1 Classification of Arguments Updated Sept 2013
| 1.71MB | 26.09.2013 | Marion Bogers | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| D2.2 WS1 evaluation of methodology, protocols and case studies, with stakeholder recommendations
Deliverable No: 2.2 WS1 evaluation of methodology, protocols and case studies, with stakeholder recommendations | 301.97KB | 25.04.2014 | Margarita Grudova | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| D5 1 WS2 Evaluation of synthesis - final
D5 1 WS2 Evaluation of synthesis - final | 619.31KB | 04.09.2014 | Margarita Grudova | DELIVERABLES | |
|
| D4.1 Introduction and Synthesis
D4.1 Introduction and Synthesis | 512.49KB | 04.09.2014 | Paula Harrison | DELIVERABLES | |
Document Library
