HomeDocument Library

        

  Document Library - Sorted Descending by Size

« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 »
Title ↓ ↑Size ↓ ↑Date ↓ ↑Provider ↓ ↑Folder ↓ ↑
MS PowerPointInitial results from case studies Pekka Jokinen
 3.25MB19.05.2014Rob BugterSECOND STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 
PDFD4.1 Part I: Literature Review
D4.1 Part I: Literature Review		 3.2MB04.09.2014Paula HarrisonDELIVERABLES 
PDFInvasive species case
 3.13MB16.10.2013Marion BogersSeville meeting 15-17 October 2013 
PDFDeep case Andalusia
 3.02MB22.02.2013Marion BogersDeep cases PPTs 
MS PowerPointEcosystem services as arguments for biodiversity protection
by Pam Berry		 3MB19.05.2013Margarita GrudovaFIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 
ImageGroup photo
Group photo		 2.97MB06.06.2014Margarita GrudovaSECOND STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 
PDFD2.3 Synthesising the analysis on effectiveness
 2.87MB07.10.2014Marion BogersDELIVERABLES 
MS PowerPointArguments for biodiversity as expressed in the literature
By Bruce Howard		 2.69MB22.05.2013 FIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 
PDFSocio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being
Ecosystem services studies currently lack information regarding stakeholders' socio-cultural values. This information is highly relevant to human well-being, which is the motivation of ecosystem services assessments. We present results from an analysis of stakeholders' perceptions of ecosystem services, well-being and drivers of change in two semi-arid watersheds in south-eastern Spain. Based on the information compiled through a literature review, participant observation and semi-structured interviews, we designed a questionnaire and conducted 381 interviews. Our results show that semiarid watersheds deliver a large variety of ecosystem services; however, these services are perceived in different ways. We identified five stakeholder groups, including: locals dependent on provisioning ecosystem services, locals not directly dependent on provisioning ecosystem services, environmental and local development professionals and rural and nature tourists. Overall, provisioning services related to traditional practices were perceived as highly important and highly vulnerable by every stakeholder group. However, we found contrasting perceptions of some ecosystem services among stakeholders and of the relevant drivers of change and well-being. We suggest that socio-cultural valuation is a useful tool to prioritize ecosystem services but more attention should be directed to emerging trade-offs. Linking values to other stakeholder perceptions might be a useful way to move forward in ecosystem services valuation.		 2.68MB29.10.2014Margarita GrudovaBESAFE acknowledged and related SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS 
MS PowerPointTemplate PPT
 2.53MB09.10.2012Marion BogersGENERAL DOCUMENTS (DoW, GA, logos) 
PDFFrom supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service
Worldwide water managers and policy makers are faced by the increasing demands for limited and scarce water resources, particularly in semi-arid ecosystems. This study assesses water regulation service in semi-arid ecosystems of the southeastern Iberian Peninsula. Comparisons between the supply–demand sides were analyzed across different landscape units. We mapped the biophysical supply as the potential groundwater recharged by aquifers and water supplies from reservoirs. The social demand was focused on an analysis of water consumed or used for irrigation and the stakeholder’s perceptions regarding water regulation importance and vulnerability. Results show that some landscape units are able to maintain and conserve water regulation service when the volume of recharge water by aquifers and the water supply from reservoirs is greater than its consumption (e.g. rural landscape units). However, we also found potential social conflicts in landscape units where water consumption and use is much greater than the water recharge and supply. This particularly occurs in the non-protected littoral areas with the highest water consumption and where water is perceived as a non-important and vulnerable natural resource. Overall, our results emphasized the importance of assessing ecosystem services from both supply to demand sides, for identifying social conflicts and potential trade-offs, and to provide practical information about how to integrate the ecosystem service research into landscape management and planning.		 2.51MB01.07.2014Margarita GrudovaBESAFE acknowledged and related SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS 
UnknownWater quality regulation database
 2.38MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
MS PowerPointWS 1 case studies FINAL
 2.33MB21.05.2013Malgorzata BlicharskaFIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 
MS WordReview Report 170413
 2.26MB24.04.2013Paula HarrisonReview databases 
MS PowerPointPrimmer BESAFE WS1 How do arguments generate effects
 2.24MB20.05.2013Eeva PrimmerFIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 
PDFBIOMOT Common Concept Document
 2.12MB01.11.2012Marion BogersBESAFE-BIOMOT UK Case Study discussion 
ImageBESAFE working process
This picture is taken in the meeting room, in Manchester		 2.11MB26.02.2013Margarita GrudovaManchester meeting Feb 2013 
ImageBESAFE-BIOMOT group photo
This is a group photo of the participants in the BIOMOT-BESAFE joint meeting		 2.05MB26.02.2013Margarita GrudovaManchester meeting Feb 2013 
UnknownPotable water database
 2MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
UnknownTimber Production database
 2MB24.04.2013Paula HarrisonReview databases 
PDFConsortium agreement
This is the signed CA of BESAFE.		 1.98MB21.12.2011Pavel StoevGENERAL DOCUMENTS (DoW, GA, logos) 
PDFBialowieza case
 1.97MB16.10.2013Marion BogersSeville meeting 15-17 October 2013 
MS WordProtocol WP3 Comparative Study
 1.96MB29.04.2013Dieter MortelmansPROTOCOLS 
MS Word Protocol WP3 Comparative Study
 1.96MB10.05.2013Margarita GrudovaWP3 Comparative Study Protocol 
MS WordComparative Study Protocol (word)
 1.96MB06.06.2013Ann HerzeleCOMPARATIVE STUDY WP3 

See all files in tree view 


 
   © 2025 BESAFE. All rights reserved. Created and maintained by Pensoft