 | 2.1 A literature review on methods to assess the effectiveness of arguments for biodiversity protection
| 1.82MB | 22.04.2012 | Pekka Jokinen | SC Wageningen 23-26 April 2012 | |
 |
 | WP2 - A literature review on methods This is a presenattion of WP2 - a literature review of methods.. | 1.82MB | 27.04.2012 | Pavel Stoev | Presentations_23-4-2012 | |
 |
 | Powerpoint Argument Mapping ISPRA
| 1.84MB | 29.04.2013 | Dieter Mortelmans | WP3 Comparative Study Protocol | |
 |
 | Presentation Argument Mapping ISPRA
| 1.84MB | 06.06.2013 | Ann Herzele | COMPARATIVE STUDY WP3 | |
 |
 | BESAFE WS2 Bugter introduction
| 1.89MB | 19.05.2014 | Marion Bogers | SECOND STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP | |
 |
 | Carbon sequestration database
| 1.91MB | 14.11.2012 | Paula Harrison | Review databases | |
 |
 | How do arguments differ at different levels of governance? by Ann Van Herzele | 1.91MB | 19.05.2013 | Margarita Grudova | FIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP | |
 |
 | Protocol WP3 Comparative Study
| 1.96MB | 29.04.2013 | Dieter Mortelmans | PROTOCOLS | |
 |
 | Protocol WP3 Comparative Study
| 1.96MB | 10.05.2013 | Margarita Grudova | WP3 Comparative Study Protocol | |
 |
 | Comparative Study Protocol (word)
| 1.96MB | 06.06.2013 | Ann Herzele | COMPARATIVE STUDY WP3 | |
 |
 | Bialowieza case
| 1.97MB | 16.10.2013 | Marion Bogers | Seville meeting 15-17 October 2013 | |
 |
 | Consortium agreement This is the signed CA of BESAFE. | 1.98MB | 21.12.2011 | Pavel Stoev | GENERAL DOCUMENTS (DoW, GA, logos) | |
 |
 | Potable water database
| 2MB | 14.11.2012 | Paula Harrison | Review databases | |
 |
 | Timber Production database
| 2MB | 24.04.2013 | Paula Harrison | Review databases | |
 |
 | BESAFE-BIOMOT group photo This is a group photo of the participants in the BIOMOT-BESAFE joint meeting | 2.05MB | 26.02.2013 | Margarita Grudova | Manchester meeting Feb 2013 | |
 |
 | BESAFE working process This picture is taken in the meeting room, in Manchester | 2.11MB | 26.02.2013 | Margarita Grudova | Manchester meeting Feb 2013 | |
 |
 | BIOMOT Common Concept Document
| 2.12MB | 01.11.2012 | Marion Bogers | BESAFE-BIOMOT UK Case Study discussion | |
 |
 | Primmer BESAFE WS1 How do arguments generate effects
| 2.24MB | 20.05.2013 | Eeva Primmer | FIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP | |
 |
 | Review Report 170413
| 2.26MB | 24.04.2013 | Paula Harrison | Review databases | |
 |
 | WS 1 case studies FINAL
| 2.33MB | 21.05.2013 | Malgorzata Blicharska | FIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP | |
 |
 | Water quality regulation database
| 2.38MB | 14.11.2012 | Paula Harrison | Review databases | |
 |
 | From supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service Worldwide water managers and policy makers are faced by the increasing demands for limited and scarce water resources, particularly in semi-arid ecosystems. This study assesses water regulation service in semi-arid ecosystems of the southeastern Iberian Peninsula. Comparisons between the supply–demand sides were analyzed across different landscape units. We mapped the biophysical supply as the potential groundwater recharged by aquifers and water supplies from reservoirs. The social demand was focused on an analysis of water consumed or used for irrigation and the stakeholder’s perceptions regarding water regulation importance and vulnerability. Results show that some landscape units are able to maintain and conserve water regulation service when the volume of recharge water by aquifers and the water supply from reservoirs is greater than its consumption (e.g. rural landscape units). However, we also found potential social conflicts in landscape units where water consumption and use is much greater than the water recharge and supply. This particularly occurs in the non-protected littoral areas with the highest water consumption and where water is perceived as a non-important and vulnerable natural resource. Overall, our results emphasized the importance of assessing ecosystem services from both supply to demand sides, for identifying social conflicts and potential trade-offs, and to provide practical information about how to integrate the ecosystem service research into landscape management and planning. | 2.51MB | 01.07.2014 | Margarita Grudova | BESAFE acknowledged and related SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS | |
 |
 | Template PPT
| 2.53MB | 09.10.2012 | Marion Bogers | GENERAL DOCUMENTS (DoW, GA, logos) | |
 |
 | Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being Ecosystem services studies currently lack information regarding stakeholders' socio-cultural values. This information is highly relevant to human well-being, which is the motivation of ecosystem services assessments. We present results from an analysis of stakeholders' perceptions of ecosystem services, well-being and drivers of change in two semi-arid watersheds in south-eastern Spain. Based on the information compiled through a literature review, participant observation and semi-structured interviews, we designed a questionnaire and conducted 381 interviews. Our results show that semiarid watersheds deliver a large variety of ecosystem services; however, these services are perceived in different ways. We identified five stakeholder groups, including: locals dependent on provisioning ecosystem services, locals not directly dependent on provisioning ecosystem services, environmental and local development professionals and rural and nature tourists. Overall, provisioning services related to traditional practices were perceived as highly important and highly vulnerable by every stakeholder group. However, we found contrasting perceptions of some ecosystem services among stakeholders and of the relevant drivers of change and well-being. We suggest that socio-cultural valuation is a useful tool to prioritize ecosystem services but more attention should be directed to emerging trade-offs. Linking values to other stakeholder perceptions might be a useful way to move forward in ecosystem services valuation. | 2.68MB | 29.10.2014 | Margarita Grudova | BESAFE acknowledged and related SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS | |
 |
 | Arguments for biodiversity as expressed in the literature By Bruce Howard | 2.69MB | 22.05.2013 | | FIRST STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP | |