HomeDocument Library

        

  Document Library - Sorted Ascending by Date

« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 »
Title ↓ ↑Size ↓ ↑Date ↓ ↑Provider ↓ ↑Folder ↓ ↑
MS WordWP4 actions Sweden Sept 2012
 47KB09.10.2012Marion BogersWP4_DOCUMENTATION 
MS WordFinal Minutes
 83.7KB18.10.2012Marion BogersSeptember meeting 2012 (Sweden) 
PDFBIOMOT Common Concept Document
 2.12MB01.11.2012Marion BogersBESAFE-BIOMOT UK Case Study discussion 
MS ExcelAction list Oct 2012
 14.07KB01.11.2012Marion BogersSeptember meeting 2012 (Sweden) 
MS WordWP4 meeting notes & actions 240912
 50.5KB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonWP4_DOCUMENTATION 
UnknownCarbon sequestration database
 1.91MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
UnknownErosion protection database
 1.34MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
UnknownFlood protection database
 1.44MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
UnknownFreshwater fishing database
 3.63MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
UnknownPollination database
 1.34MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
UnknownPotable water database
 2MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
UnknownWater quality regulation database
 2.38MB14.11.2012Paula HarrisonReview databases 
MS WordDeliverable template
 435.5KB20.11.2012Marion BogersGENERAL DOCUMENTS (DoW, GA, logos) 
PDFDeliverable No: D2.1 Report on the selection of case studies
The general aim of the BESAFE project is to investigate which arguments are the most effective in conserving biodiversity in different contexts. This report outlines the selection process of the case studies which will be used to answer the main research questions of the project. The paper reports the particular steps of the process, describes the relevant criteria for selection and provides the most essential information about each of the chosen case studies. The final set of 12 case studies represents a wide variety of ecological, social-economic and political contexts, as well as a diversity of different governance levels. Moreover, the cases address several governance levels and thus enable analysis of the links and transferability between the levels. In addition, two comparative studies have been chosen to enable a European level comparison between different countries.		 331.35KB29.11.2012Margarita GrudovaDELIVERABLES 
MS WordLiterature review on methods to assess the effectiveness of arguments for biodiversity protection
Task 2.1		 224KB04.12.2012Marion BogersWP2_DOCUMENTATION 
PDFInternational Innovation paper, web resolution
BESAFE publication in the December 2012 issue of International Innovation, low res version		 178.46KB10.12.2012Rob BugterBESAFE Publications 
PDFInternational Innovation paper, high resolution
BESAFE publication in the December 2012 issue of International Innovation, full print resolution		 4.41MB10.12.2012Rob BugterBESAFE Publications 
MS WordQ-statements_revised_MT
 53KB15.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
MS ExcelQ-sort charts_MT
 32.5KB15.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
MS WordQ_methodnote_MT.
 37.36KB15.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
MS WordFramework and protocols_RB
 96.49KB15.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
MS WordProgress report_Feb 2013
 22.38KB15.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
MS WordDraft agenda Manchester meeting
 45.85KB15.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
MS WordPractical Arrangment Ispra meeting
 65.5KB21.02.2013Joachim MaesPROJECT MEETINGS 

See all files in tree view 


 
   © 2026 BESAFE. All rights reserved. Created and maintained by Pensoft