HomeDocument Library

        

  Document Library - Sorted Ascending by Title

« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 »
Title ↓ ↑Size ↓ ↑Date ↓ ↑Provider ↓ ↑Folder ↓ ↑
MS PowerPointIspra
 681.76KB21.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
ImageKickoff group photo
This is the group photo taken at the BESAFE kickoff.		 6.52MB21.12.2011Pavel StoevBESAFE_KICKOFF_NOVEMBER_2011 
UnknownLandscape aethetics database
 1.81MB24.04.2013Paula HarrisonReview databases 
MS WordLarge carnivore case, Norway, NINA
 47.5KB27.08.2013Ulrich Heinkcase study methods 
MS WordLarge mammals Norway
 52.9KB16.06.2014Malgorzata BlicharskaCASE STUDY REPORTS 
MS PowerPointLarge mammals Norway
 1.23MB21.02.2013Marion BogersDeep cases PPTs 
MS WordLiterature review on methods to assess the effectiveness of arguments for biodiversity protection
Task 2.1		 224KB04.12.2012Marion BogersWP2_DOCUMENTATION 
MS PowerPointLower Danube River
 584KB21.02.2013Marion BogersDeep cases PPTs 
MS PowerPointManchester shared meeting_Rob
 456.39KB21.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
PDFMapping value plurality towards ecosystem services in the case of Norwegian wildlife management: A Q analysis
For many deep-rooted resource conflicts where the cultural component of ecosystem services (ES) is strong, standard monetary valuation may be methodologically difficult and not always meaningful. A deeper understanding of the value plurality of key stakeholders may be called for to develop acceptable policies. We use the Q method to analyse the perceived and actual trade-offs related to Norwegian wildlife management, a source of prominent conflict in Norway. We identify and classify distinct arguments in the wildlife management debate following the ES framework, and use the Q method to explore extant/prominent narratives characterising stakeholders' perceptions of the importance of arguments about biodiversity and ES. Finally, we reflect on whether and to what extent the Q method can contribute to our understanding of resource conflicts, underlying values, and ES trade-offs. Three clear narratives appeared: Pro-sheep grazing (cultural), pro-carnivore conservation (intrinsic) and a middle position emphasising recreational hunting (utilitarian). Despite considerable disagreement among narratives, the Q analysis also revealed areas of common ground useful for developing acceptable policies. Given the inherent complexity of socio-ecological systems, it is useful to draw from a diverse toolbox of methods, including the Q method for ES analysis.		 619.88KB12.08.2015Margarita GrudovaBESAFE acknowledged and related SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS 
MS WordMarine turbine
 35.95KB16.06.2014Malgorzata BlicharskaCASE STUDY REPORTS 
MS PowerPointMarine turbine
 1.2MB21.02.2013Marion BogersDeep cases PPTs 
PDFMarine turbine case
 893.95KB16.10.2013Marion BogersSeville meeting 15-17 October 2013 
MS PowerPointMethodology_WP3_Argument_Map_Ann
 1.16MB21.02.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
MS Wordmethods note
 37.36KB24.04.2013Mette TermansenQ-study 
MS WordMinutes
The minutes from the meeting.		 85.05KB21.12.2011Pavel StoevBESAFE_KICKOFF_NOVEMBER_2011 
MS WordMinutes Manchester
 45.62KB20.03.2013Marion BogersManchester meeting Feb 2013 
PDFN2000 EU LIFE case
 360.76KB16.10.2013Marion BogersSeville meeting 15-17 October 2013 
MS PowerPointN2000 Hungary
 124.9KB21.02.2013Marion BogersDeep cases PPTs 
PDFN2000 Hungary case
 59.54KB16.10.2013Marion BogersSeville meeting 15-17 October 2013 
PDFN2000 NL case
 192.47KB16.10.2013Marion BogersSeville meeting 15-17 October 2013 
MS WordNatura 2000 Hungary
 145.79KB16.06.2014Malgorzata BlicharskaCASE STUDY REPORTS 
MS WordNatura 2000 JRC
 189.98KB16.06.2014Malgorzata BlicharskaCASE STUDY REPORTS 
MS WordNatura 2000 the Netherlands
 483.53KB16.06.2014Malgorzata BlicharskaCASE STUDY REPORTS 
MS PowerPointNature 2000 test case Joachim
 297KB11.04.2013Marion BogersPROTOCOLS 

See all files in tree view 


 
   © 2026 BESAFE. All rights reserved. Created and maintained by Pensoft